Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Perianal Fistula
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Perianal fistula is an abnormal infected tract that connects the internal opening in the anal canal to the external
opening in the perianal skin. It is an important cause of significant patient morbidity related to the lower intestinal tract. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice in the pre-operative assessment of perianal fistulas due to its excellent
soft tissue resolution to accurately demonstrate the anatomy of the perianal region and the relationship of the fistulous tracts
to the pelvic diaphragm and the ischiorectal fossae.
Aims and Objectives: This study aims to assess the role of MRI in evaluation of perianal fistula and to correlate the imaging
findings with post-surgical data.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, 50 patients of all age groups with perianal fistulas were evaluated by MRI in
the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital over a period of 1 year. MRI was performed
on 1.5 Tesla Hitachi ECHELON SMART - 523 MRI machine using the required protocol and sequences. Fistulas were classified
according to St James’s University Hospital MRI classification system and imaging findings were compared with post-surgical data.
Results: MRI could detect the presence of fistula in all 50 patients, indicating 100% sensitivity. Most patients (68%) had internal
opening on the posterior aspect of anal canal. Active fistulous tract was seen in 43 patients (86%) and chronic fibrosed tracts in
7 patients (14%). The most common type according to MRI grading was Grade I (54%), followed by Grade II (30%), Grade III
(8%), and Grade IV (6%), respectively. MRI correctly described the type of fistula in 96% of cases.
Conclusion: This study concludes that MRI proved as a valuable imaging modality in evaluation of perianal fistula and should
always be performed in patients before surgery.
References
fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics
2000;20:623-35.
2. Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor AC, Ambrose NS.
Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: Predictive value of MR imaging.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:403-6.
3. Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 2006;239:18-33.
4. Charles P, Perry J. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: Spectrum of
imaging features. Radiographics 2012;32:194-7.
5. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J
Surg 1976;63:1-2.
6. Torkzad MR, Karlbom U. MRI for assessment of anal fistula. Insights
Imaging 2010;1:62-71.
7. Mendoza LR, Borobia AR, Gonzalez CZ, Pena T, Ros P. MR imaging in
anal fistulae. Rev Argent Radiol 2004;68:237-44.
8. Beckingham IJ, Spencer JA, Ward J, Dyke GW, Adams C, Ambrose NS.
Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance
imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1996;83:1396-8.